I know that there has been plenty of "school yard bullying" surrounding this year's Presidential election, from both sides of the fence. Just think, next Wednesday we'll be out of this advertisement blitz, and onto the talking heads second guessing where one party went wrong and where they went right, and who's counting what state's ballots over again, and why.
I've tried to keep an open mind concerning both political parties and their agendas by looking into and trying to poke holes in any argument that has moved me, from the United States part in the global economy, global warming, personal rights, large corporation vs small business owner/operator contributions to the U.S. economy, Presidential candidate flip-flopping, the burden of executive privilege, the court of public opinion, health care, and any of the "hot right now" topics that get turned over by hungry journalists. In reviewing my posts, I have to admit, it does seem that I have been mostly into defending the Democrats point of view for this election.
THIS DOESN'T MEAN I APPROVE OF EITHER CANDIDATE!
But it does mean that given the present choices, I feel that anyone of you are probably just as suited to be the next President of the United States. I think this election cycle will be decided by people voting on platform ideals, and misinformation, rather than for a person with a pure vision, political ability, and accurate and transparent information.
Please read Forbes Magazine's evaluation of yesterday's endorsement by "The Economist" magazine. While "The Economist" is based out of London, it holds a different view of global economics. Whether you are inclined to vote Romney or Obama, this is a good read.
The Economist Magazine Endorses Obama
And Mayor Bloomberg's reasoning.
New York City Mayor Endorses Obama
Campy Out!
No comments:
Post a Comment